data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2a5/7f2a58ecd1449de4f254fa03bd0d6294a84e7f90" alt="Ping blueprint irons review rick shiels"
Don’t usually see those two things together.” The Blueprint is the definition of a modern-day blade.ĬlubTester’s take (2-hdcp): “Small profile, but I watched the ball rocket off the face. Even for a scratch golfer, getting a few more yards is a welcome sight when you’re going toe to toe with players who are using better-player products. The beauty of these irons is how effortlessly they blend the DNA of a muscleback with the power of a better-player iron. And did we mention the intricate four-step, multistage process? The Blueprint may be a one-piece forging, but more than 50 steps are required during manufacturing, including machining the face and grooves. A machined tungsten screw in the toe gives the head a slight bump in heel-toe forgiveness over the traditional version. Forged from 8620 carbon steel, the iron boasts reduced offset and a shorter blade length than PING’s iBlade. Only this isn’t the version your dad grew up with. Which brings us to PING’s Blueprint, a blade that certainly looks the part. You’re giving up all of the comforts that come with a larger profile for something that works the ball on command and hits a certain yardage with regularity. Our take: Muscleback blades are supposed to be butter-knife thin and lack the forgiveness and distance typically found in a better-player cavity-back.
PING BLUEPRINT IRONS REVIEW RICK SHIELS FULL
You can find the full list of irons and test results here. Below are the results for the Ping Blueprint irons. For the second installment of ClubTest 2020, we tested and reviewed 57 new iron models to help you find the right one for your game.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2a5/7f2a58ecd1449de4f254fa03bd0d6294a84e7f90" alt="Ping blueprint irons review rick shiels"